Breaking the Logjam conducted a vetting session of their report at Resources for the Future (RFF). Michael Livermore participated in vetting the section on Logjam’s recommendations on cost-benefit analysis, which are based on the principles laid out in Retaking Rationality.
Dean Revesz debated philosopher Marc Sagoff on the merits of cost-benefit analysis at this event sponsored by the National Capital Chapter of the Society for Risk Analysis. The debate was part of the Benefit-Cost Analysis Conference sponsored by the MacArthur Foundation.
Over 40 environmental experts from academia, environmental groups, business, and government came together at NYU School of Law to present proposals for new federal programs on climate and oceans and major changes in existing laws for air pollution, water pollution etc. Michael Livermore presented an early version of a working paper titled, Cause or Cure? Cost-Benefit Analysis and Regulatory Gridlock.
Page 6 of 6