Publications

The Institute for Policy Integrity produces three types of publications: policy briefs, reports, and working papers. Geared to an audience of political decisionmakers, our policy briefs provide incisive and focused analysis on timely policy topics. Our report series develops deeper research and examination of our core issues. Our working papers give an opportunity for extensive and original scholarly research and analysis from established experts as well as fresh new voices.

Recent Publications

  • Balanced Justice

    Balanced Justice

    Cost-Benefit Analysis and Criminal Justice Policy

    Policy Brief | by Jennifer Rosenberg and Sara Mark | October 19th, 2011

    Crime and justice are not usually associated with cost-benefit analysis. But they should be, according to new research. This is especially true in an economic downturn, when government funding is scarce. In “Balanced Justice,” released jointly with the Center for the Administration of Criminal Law, author Jennifer Rosenberg reviews a growing body of research showing that counting the costs and benefits of our nation’s justice system can highlight areas of improvement that can save billions of taxpayer dollars without compromising public safety.

    Download PDF | More »

  • Internet Benefits

    Internet Benefits

    Consumer Surplus and Net Neutrality

    Policy Brief | by J. Scott Holladay, A.J. Glusman, Steven Soloway | October 3rd, 2011

    This policy brief describes how a weakening of the principle of network neutrality might impact the Web. Based on an analysis of Internet usage, it finds that Internet infrastructure and content work together to generate huge economic benefits for consumers—possibly as much as $5,686 per user, per year.

    Download PDF | More »

  • Does Process Matter

    Does Process Matter

    Regulatory Procedure and Regulatory Output in the States

    Working Paper | by Stuart Shapiro, Ph.D. and Deborah Borie-Holtz Ph.D. | September 21st, 2011

    Rulemaking in the states has become much more widespread than it was when many state legislatures began to pass their administrative procedures acts more than 40 years ago. A wide diversity of rulemaking procedures presents a natural laboratory in which to study several questions that have long interested scholars of the regulatory process. This paper finds that the level of rulemaking is more closely correlated to the lawmaking activity in the state rather than proceduralization which suggests no disrespect for the law, as Churchill argued, but rather that the lawmakers themselves have given rise to the thousands of regulations in the states.

    Download PDF | More »