Colorado is considering a major overhaul of its electric resource planning rules and renewable energy standards. Jason Schwartz recently provided testimony in a Senate hearing on the reauthorization of the state’s Public Utilities Commission as part of this overhaul. Schwartz spoke about a possible requirement for the PUC to weigh the social costs of pollution in its decisions. Coloradoans, he explained, are paying the costs of climate pollution in the form of more dangerous wildfires, agricultural damages, declining snowpack, and a range of severe health effects. Many of these important costs can be quantified. In his testimony, Schwartz recommended that the PUC uses Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases metrics when evaluating energy resources in order to improve public welfare.
Related Reading
-
Policy Integrity Scholarship and Advocacy Shapes EPA’s New Climate Damage Valuations
Project Updates / December 2, 2023
-
EPA Updates Climate Damage Estimates in New Methane Rule
Media Resources / December 2, 2023
-
Analytical Clarity: How Updated Climate-Damage Values and Discount Rates Will Affect Regulatory Analysis
Publications / December 1, 2023
-
Statement on Presidential Directive Promoting the Use of Climate Metrics
Media Resources / September 21, 2023
-
The Social Cost of Carbon: Options for Applying a Metric in Flux
Publications / September 21, 2023