The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) proposed amendments to its regulations for designating critical habitat. Several of FWS’s changes are inconsistent with the best practices for weighing the costs and benefits of agency action. We submitted comments explaining how the proposal is flawed in multiple ways and should not be finalized.
Related Reading
-
Comments to OMB on Draft Update of Circular A-4
Project Updates / June 20, 2023
-
New Guidance Improves Consideration of Health, Equity, and Environmental Benefits in Regulations
Media Resources / April 6, 2023
-
Revesz Nominated to Lead OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
Media Resources / September 2, 2022
-
Toward Rationality in Oil and Gas Leasing: Building the Toolkit for Programmatic Reforms
Publications / August 6, 2021
-
Statement on Repeal of EPA Cost-Benefit Rule
Media Resources / May 13, 2021