The California Public Utilities Commission proposed using a Societal Cost Test to help select the combination of distributed energy resource projects that will result in the greatest net benefits to society. We counter the feedback that some stakeholders gave on implementing this approach in our reply comments. We argue that the Commission should: (1) expand its discussion of the legal basis for applying a societal cost test that includes a full range of externalities; (2) use the damage cost approach to determine the value of greenhouse gas abatement, rather than the proposed abatement cost approach; and (3) apply a societal discount rate to the analysis.
Related Reading
-
Rejecting the Trump Anticanon of Regulatory Mismanagement
In the News / February 17, 2021 / The Regulatory Review
-
Academics Urge Biden to Tie SCC Update to Broader Cost-Benefit Fixes
In the News / February 11, 2021 / Inside EPA
-
IPI Outlines Steps for EPA to Bolster Climate-Related Equity Analyses
In the News / February 11, 2021 / Inside EPA
-
Mandating Disclosure of Climate-Related Financial Risk
Publications / February 10, 2021
-
Improving Environmental Justice Analysis: Executive Order 12,898 and Climate Change
Publications / January 28, 2021