The Trump administration is working to repeal the EPA’s Clean Water Rule, which provides important legal clarity on the extent of wetland area subject to the Clean Water Act, ensuring greater federal protection of wetlands. In our recent comments on the attempted repeal, we show how the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers obscured the value of wetlands protection in their proposal to repeal the rule. In revising the original economic analysis, which quantified the rule’s substantial environmental and economic benefits, the agencies use arbitrary and inconsistent assumptions to suggest that the rule is not cost-benefit justified.
Related Reading
-
Amicus Brief on EPA Good Neighbor Rule
Project Updates / June 24, 2024
-
Analyzing Major Rules in the Courts
In the News / June 24, 2024 / Yale Journal on Regulation
-
Expert Declaration in Case Requesting a Stay of EPA’s Methane Rule for the Oil and Gas Sector
Project Updates / June 11, 2024
-
Within Its Wheelhouse: EPA’s Latest Power Plant Regulations Rely on Traditional Approaches Left Available After West Virginia v. EPA
Publications / April 24, 2024
-
Statement on EPA’s Standards for Light- and Medium-Duty Vehicles
Media Resources / March 20, 2024