The U.S. Forest Service’s final approval of a coal mine expansion in Colorado continues to ignore climate damages, despite a 2014 ruling by the U.S. District Court of Colorado asking the Forest Service to disclose the effects greenhouse gas emissions from the project in its Environmental Impact Statement. Our objection to the Forest Service’s decision argues that it cannot legally ignore climate costs, which are not difficult to quantify, while also monetizing the economic upside of changing these coal leases. This objection echoes our previous comments to the Forest Service on the West Elk mine expansion.
Related Reading
-
Consensus on Carbon Dioxide Removal: A Large-Sample Expert Elicitation on the Future of CDR
Publications / July 31, 2024
-
The Road Ahead for New York Cap-and-Invest: Too Many GHG Emissions?
In the News / May 3, 2024 / Policy Integrity Insights
-
Comments to EPA on GHG Regulations for Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plants
Project Updates / August 8, 2023
-
Statement on New Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Power Plants
Media Resources / May 11, 2023
-
Comments to CEQ on Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Sequestration Guidance
Project Updates / April 18, 2022