Many federal agencies are requesting the public’s suggestions for rules to repeal or reform, tacitly implying that most regulations stifle economic growth. In comments to several agencies, we argue that regulatory review should consider the public benefits of regulation, not just the costs to regulated industries, and should prioritize review of rules for which actual costs and benefits diverge significantly from predicted costs and benefits. We also recommend that agencies develop prospective plans for regulatory review going forward. The agencies for which we filed comments include the Treasury Department, the General Services Administration, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the State Department, the Department of Justice, the Farm Credit Association, and the Department of the Interior.
Related Reading
-
Amicus Brief on EPA Good Neighbor Rule
Project Updates / June 24, 2024
-
Analyzing Major Rules in the Courts
In the News / June 24, 2024 / Yale Journal on Regulation
-
Comments to EPA on GHG Regulations for Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plants
Project Updates / August 8, 2023
-
Comments to OMB on Draft Update of Circular A-4
Project Updates / June 20, 2023
-
Statement on New Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Power Plants
Media Resources / May 11, 2023