Institute for Policy Integrity logo

Twitter @policyintegrity

Publications

The Institute for Policy Integrity produces three types of publications: policy briefs, reports, and academic articles/working papers. Our policy briefs provide incisive and focused analysis on timely policy topics. Our reports develop deeper research on our core issues. Our academic articles and working papers offer original scholarly research and analysis from established experts as well as fresh new voices.

Latest Publications

  • Economists and Climate Change
    Policy Brief

    Economists and Climate Change

    Consensus and Open Questions

    By J. Scott Holladay, Jonathan Horne, and Jason A Schwartz
    November 4, 2009

    Economists and Climate Change: Consensus and Open Questions describes and analyzes the results of a survey sent to 289 economic experts on climate change. Over 84% of the respondents to the poll said that the effects of global warming will create significant risks to important sectors of the United States and global economies.

  • In the Regulatory Weeds of the Garden State
    Academic Article/Working Paper

    In the Regulatory Weeds of the Garden State

    Lessons From New Jersey’s Administrative Process

    By Debra Borie-Holtz and Stuart Shapiro
    September 1, 2009

    There is a dearth of studies about the effects of the proceduralization of the rulemaking process on state regulations. In the Regulatory Weeds of the Garden State focuses on regulations promulgated in New Jersey, both prior to and following major procedural changes enacted in the state in 2001.

  • The Other Side of the Coin
    Policy Brief

    The Other Side of the Coin

    The Economic Benefits of Climate Legislation

    By J. Scott Holladay and Jason A Schwartz
    September 1, 2009

    This brief compiles estimates from several different federal agencies, and calculates that the economic benefits of the emissions cap in the Waxman-Markey bill likely dwarf the costs by as much as 9-to-1 or more. The benefit to cost ratio was determined using the EPA’s previously released (and peer reviewed) cost estimates and a newly released “social cost of carbon” estimate from an interagency process which provides a conservative dollar figure for the benefits of greenhouse gas reductions.

  • No More Excuses
    Policy Brief

    No More Excuses

    The Economic Case for Coal Ash Regulation

    By J. Scott Holladay
    June 2, 2009

    No More Excuses: The Economic Case for Coal Ash Regulation is a brief but careful analysis which reveals several compelling findings on the regulation of the toxic by-product of coal combustion. In broad strokes, it is clear that the benefits of regulating coal ash storage facilities would far outweigh the costs. The benefits of a regulation requiring coal ash to be stored in dry conditions and in synthetically-lined, covered facilities could save tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars per storage facility.

  • Regulatory Cost-Benefit Analysis and Collective Action
    Academic Article/Working Paper

    Regulatory Cost-Benefit Analysis and Collective Action

    By Daniel H. Cole
    June 1, 2009

    In Regulatory Cost-Benefit Analysis and Collective Action, Daniel H. Cole describes the influence of cost-benefit analysis and explains how and why it is a politically useful tools for agencies, even when those agencies are not required by law to prepare regulatory cost-benefit analyses (RCBA). As Cole says in his introduction, “For better or for worse, RCBAs have significantly influenced policies for dealing with, or not dealing with, collective action problems ranging from airport enlargement to global climate change.”