EPA recently delayed the effective date of a rule that would have decreased the severity and number of chemical accidents at manufacturing facilities and refineries. State and NGO plaintiffs sued EPA over the delay, arguing that EPA did not have statutory authority to issue it, and that the delay was arbitrary and capricious. We filed a brief in support of petitioners arguing that EPA did not offer an adequate explanation for choosing to forgo the benefits of the chemical disaster rule.
Related Reading
-
Amicus Brief on EPA Good Neighbor Rule
Project Updates / June 24, 2024
-
Analyzing Major Rules in the Courts
In the News / June 24, 2024 / Yale Journal on Regulation
-
Expert Declaration in Case Requesting a Stay of EPA’s Methane Rule for the Oil and Gas Sector
Project Updates / June 11, 2024
-
Within Its Wheelhouse: EPA’s Latest Power Plant Regulations Rely on Traditional Approaches Left Available After West Virginia v. EPA
Publications / April 24, 2024
-
Statement on EPA’s Standards for Light- and Medium-Duty Vehicles
Media Resources / March 20, 2024