The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has proposed to retrospectively and prospectively establish an "expiration date" for each of its regulations. Under the proposed rule, regulations would be automatically rescinded unless HHS first completes a restrospective review of the regulation's effects on small entities pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We submitted comments criticizing the proposal, which is neither lawful nor rational. Our comments explain how HHS disregards potential costs, provides insufficient evidence that the rule would improve retrospective review, and fails to consider alternatives. HHS also failed to offer a meaningful opportunity to comment on the proposed rule.
Related Reading
-
Rejecting the Trump Anticanon of Regulatory Mismanagement
In the News / February 17, 2021 / The Regulatory Review
-
A New Era for Regulatory Review
In the News / February 16, 2021 / The Regulatory Review
-
‘Reading the Tea Leaves’: The Future of OIRA Under Biden
In the News / December 7, 2020 / Greenwire
-
Presidential Transition Guidance
Project Updates / November 9, 2020
-
Enhancing the Social Benefits of Regulatory Review: Rethinking OIRA for the Next Administration
Publications / October 28, 2020