The Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed rule, Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Considering Benefits and Costs in the Clean Air Act Rulemaking Process, is unjustified and fails to satisfy its own standards for adequately explaining the need for a new regulation. We submitted comments to EPA and the chartered Science Advisory Board noting that the proposal is unnecessary and explaining how it breaks from best practices for cost-benefit analysis of regulations in several significant ways.
Related Reading
-
Comments to OMB on Draft Update of Circular A-4
Project Updates / June 20, 2023
-
New Guidance Improves Consideration of Health, Equity, and Environmental Benefits in Regulations
Media Resources / April 6, 2023
-
Still Your Grandfather‘s Boiler: Estimating the Effects of the Clean Air Act‘s Grandfathering Provisions: Working paper
Publications / December 13, 2022
-
Revesz Nominated to Lead OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
Media Resources / September 2, 2022
-
Toward Rationality in Oil and Gas Leasing: Building the Toolkit for Programmatic Reforms
Publications / August 6, 2021