We recently submitted comments to the California Public Utilities Commission on the Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP). Retrospective review of SGIP has found that, contrary to the program’s goals, greenhouse gas emissions sometimes increase when energy storage systems are deployed. To address this unintended consequence, the CPUC Energy Division Staff issued a set of recommendations on how to improve the program, including by creating a real-time greenhouse gas emissions factor for energy storage operators to use, and by tying the SGIP incentive payments to greenhouse gas performance. Our comments provide the CPUC with our original analysis on energy storage to support these recommendations, including our recent report, Managing the Future of Energy Storage, and an academic article, by Policy Integrity’s Director, Richard Revesz, and Energy Policy Director, Burcin Unel, Ph.D, on energy storage and greenhouse gas emissions.
Related Reading
-
Consensus on Carbon Dioxide Removal: A Large-Sample Expert Elicitation on the Future of CDR
Publications / July 31, 2024
-
The Road Ahead for New York Cap-and-Invest: Too Many GHG Emissions?
In the News / May 3, 2024 / Policy Integrity Insights
-
Comments to EPA on GHG Regulations for Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plants
Project Updates / August 8, 2023
-
Statement on New Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Power Plants
Media Resources / May 11, 2023
-
Comments to CEQ on Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Sequestration Guidance
Project Updates / April 18, 2022