Policy Integrity's Economics Director Peter Howard joined climate scientists and economic experts in written testimony to the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) about the significance of excessive greenhouse gas emissions that would be generated if Enbridge’s Line 5 tunnel siting permit is approved. Howard explained that “the Proposed Project will generate a present value of $41 billion (in 2020 dollars) or more in net monetized climate costs from 2027 to 2070 as compared to the no-action alternative – in other words, the Proposed Project will generate average annual monetized climate costs of approximately $1 billion each year over this period, plus significant unmonetized climate effects and other unquantified pollution costs to human health and the environment.”
Related Reading
-
New Report Proposes Reforms for Gas Pipeline Approval Process
Media Resources / February 15, 2022
-
Reforming Pipeline Review: Taking a Closer Look at the Need for New Natural Gas Infrastructure
Publications / February 15, 2022
-
Testimony in House Natural Resources Hearing on Gulf of Mexico Oil and Gas Leasing
Project Updates / January 20, 2022
-
Comments on BOEM’s Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Cook Inlet Lease Sale 258
Project Updates / December 13, 2021
-
The Climate Costs of Keeping Line 5 Open Would Be Very High
In the News / September 17, 2021 / Grist