Menu
Institute for Policy Integrity logo

In the News

  • Mayor Bloomberg could help save 188 lives a year by using cleaner heating fuels: study

    Switching from cheap and dirty #6 fuel oil to cleaner #2 oil would save up to 56 lives a year, and switching to natural gas would save up to 188 people, according to scientific models from New York University Law School’s Institute for Policy Integrity.

  • Cost-benefit analysis: net neutrality makes economic sense

    “Without net neutrality rules, new technologies could lead to pricing practices that transfer wealth from content providers to ISPs,” warns the Institute for Policy Integrity, “a form of price discrimination that would reduce the return on investment for Internet content—meaning website owners, bloggers, newspapers, and businesses would have less incentive to expand their sites and applications.”

  • Revesz on the cost of climate change to future generations

    The question of how seriously we should worry about the most severe effects of global warming depends on what we are willing to pay to avoid serious harm to our children and grandchildren.

  • Obama’s EPA Faces Legal Minefield Over CO2 Regulation (subscription required.)

    Jason Schwartz, a Legal Fellow at the Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School, said “the EPA doesn’t have a slam-dunk case.”

    “Neither the absurd-results canon nor the doctrine of administrative necessity will allow the EPA to create exemptions to those requirements,” Schwartz and his Institute for Policy Integrity colleague, Inimai Chettiar, wrote in an April policy article.

    One potentially saving argument, Schwartz says, is the EPA’s plan to phase in different threshold-level emitters, allowing five years to study streamlining the permitting process for facilities under the 25,000 level. The courts may defer to the agency’s action on that account.

  • EPA CO2 Danger Decision Opens Door To Legal Petitions

    While the head of the Environmental Protection Agency Lisa Jackson has said she’s focused on regulating light-duty vehicle emissions and the largest stationary sources, petitions already filed with the EPA may force much more stringent action, experts say.

    “The EPA will be locked into a path that ends in the regulation of most mobile sources,” including airplanes, trucks and trains or the fuels that run them, says Jason Schwartz and Inimai Chettiar, Legal Fellows at the Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School.

  • Livermore on the anniversary of the coal ash spill in Kingtson, Tennessee

    On December 22nd, 2008, a quiet evening in the town of Harriman, Tennessee was interrupted when 1.2 billion gallons of toxic coal ash sludge burst out of a nearby landfill, poisoning the land and water in its path and causing untold hardship for families whose lives were turned upside down. A year later, the underlying cause of this massive environmental disaster is still unregulated.

  • Livermore quoted on Obama’s options for a global climate treaty

    Michael [Livermore], the executive director of the Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law has echoed this view, noting that a section of the Clean Air act authorizes the president “to enter international agreements… and to develop standards and regulations which protect the stratosphere.” He concluded: “This could provide a foundation for an executive agreement—and Obama wouldn’t need to round up 60 votes from the Senate.”

  • Mention of Livermore on Obama’s options in Copenhagen

    Does Mr. Obama really need 67 votes in the Senate to approve any climate treaty? Maybe not, says Michael Livermore in TNR’s The Vine—he may have executive authority.

  • Livermore sends dispatches from the COP15 talks

    No doubt, negotiators in Copenhagen will be up all night, trying to forge language that can bridge the large divides that still remain between key players. Getting to an agreement that can set up the next round of talks for success, without giving up too much bargaining power, is no doubt the first priority for all parties. But as we keep moving from discussions to the moral and value questions of responsibility for taking the next step, the negotiations will only continue to get harder.

  • Livermore on Obama’s options in Copenhagen

    President Obama will arrive in Copenhagen tomorrow to weigh in on the talks over a global climate treaty. But will he and his envoys be “hemmed in” by Congress, as John Kerry suggested on Thursday? After all, even if the United States does agree to an international climate treaty, many observers have argued that the treaty would still need 67 votes in the Senate for ratification. And, given how difficult it’s proving just to round up 60 votes for a climate bill, the odds of 67 look dim. So are there any other options available? Actually, yes.