Recent Projects

The Council on Environmental Quality is proposing to revise its National Environmental Policy Act guidance on the consideration of greenhouse gas emissions. We submitted comments explaining how the draft guidance makes vague and misleading statements with respect to when and how agencies must analyze the greenhouse gas emissions associated with their project approvals. We encourage CEQ to correct errors and align the guidance with federal caselaw and existing regulations.

The Department of Energy requested input on impact and emissions analysis for upcoming energy conservation standards. We submitted comments encouraging DOE to continue to monetize the full climate benefits of greenhouse gas emissions reductions. 

The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) and Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) have proposed several quantitative and qualitative value categories it intends to examine in its study of the value of DERs. We submitted comments supporting their inclusion of avoided emissions costs, which covers both greenhouse gas emissions and ambient air pollutants, as a value category. We also encourage DEEP and PURA to include electricity system resilience among the quantifiable benefits of DER deployment.

The Department of Energy (DOE) recently asked for input on energy conservation standards for metal halide lamp fixtures. We submitted comments encourage DOE to continue monetizing the full climate benefits of greenhouse gas emissions reductions.

The Department of Energy (DOE) recently proposed changes to its process for prescribing energy conservation standards for consumer products and commercial/industrial equipment. We submitted comments explaining how DOE’s proposed energy savings thresholds and consumer test are unjustified and will reduce important consumer and environmental benefits.

The Department of Energy (DOE) proposed changes to the Process Rule for prescribing energy conservation standards. We submitted comments and additional comments explaining how certain proposed changes violate both DOE's statutory mandate and the principles of rational rulemaking. We emphasize that the significance of energy savings must be weighed by considering all important costs and benefits.

The Department of Energy (DOE) recently asked for input on energy conservation standards for certain electrical grid equipment. We submitted comments encouraging DOE to continue monetizing the full climate benefits of greenhouse gas emissions reductions.

Peter Howard and Jason Schwartz provided an expert report on Colorado’s Zero Emission Vehicle program, which will reduce millions of tons of greenhouse gas emissions annually. They demonstrate how the program’s climate benefits can be monetized and how those estimates can provide useful context for decisionmakers and the public.

We submitted joint comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on its environmental assessment of the Jordan Cove natural gas exports project in Oregon. FERC failed to provide a meaningful analysis of the pipeline’s climate effects.

We submitted joint comments on the Army Corps of Engineers’ environmental assessment of the Pebble Mine Project in southwest Alaska. The Corps quantifies greenhouse gas emissions from the project but fails to provide a monetized estimate of the climate damages those emissions will produce.