The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently finalized a rule that expands protections for healthcare workers who deny care based on moral or religious beliefs. We submitted amicus briefs in support of challenges to the rule filed by states, municipalities, medical organizations, and civil-rights advocates. Our argument details how HHS’s analysis of the rule’s economic impacts ignores significant costs while touting entirely speculative benefits. We submitted briefs to the Southern District of New York, Northern District of California, and the District of Maryland.
Related Reading
-
Comments on HHS’s Sunset Rule
Project Updates / December 4, 2020
-
Amicus Brief in Appeal of Conscience Protections Decision
Project Updates / October 20, 2020
-
Amicus Brief in SDNY on Healthcare Nondiscrimination Rule
Project Updates / September 17, 2020
-
Statement on Title X “Gag Rule” Court Decision
Media Resources / September 3, 2020
-
Comments to HHS on Blood Donation Policies
Project Updates / June 19, 2020