Many federal agencies are requesting the public’s suggestions for rules to repeal or reform, tacitly implying that most regulations stifle economic growth. In comments to several agencies, we argue that regulatory review should consider the public benefits of regulation, not just the costs to regulated industries, and should prioritize review of rules for which actual costs and benefits diverge significantly from predicted costs and benefits. The agencies for which we filed comments include the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee, the Federal Maritime Commission, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Coast Guard.
Related Reading
-
Rejecting the Trump Anticanon of Regulatory Mismanagement
In the News / February 17, 2021 / The Regulatory Review
-
A New Era for Regulatory Review
In the News / February 16, 2021 / The Regulatory Review
-
‘Reading the Tea Leaves’: The Future of OIRA Under Biden
In the News / December 7, 2020 / Greenwire
-
Comments on HHS’s Sunset Rule
Project Updates / December 4, 2020
-
Presidential Transition Guidance
Project Updates / November 9, 2020