Recent Projects

The Department of Energy requested input on how it can enhance the resilience of electric infrastructure systems against severe weather events. We submitted comments, attaching our report on grid resilience and highlighting key takeways that may support DOE efforts to improve the power system.

A federal appeals court recently rejected industry and state challenges to a set of Obama-era air quality standards, which the Institute for Policy Integrity had filed an amicus brief defending. In 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) strengthened National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level ozone, the primary ingredient in urban smog and the source of a variety of respiratory ills. The coal mining company Murray Energy Corporation, along with trade associations and several state attorneys general, brought suit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, arguing that the new standards were unnecessarily stringent and impossible to achieve. We filed an amicus brief in support of the standards.

The Department of Energy requested input on impact and emissions analysis for upcoming energy conservation standards. We submitted comments encouraging DOE to continue to monetize the full climate benefits of greenhouse gas emissions reductions. 

The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) and Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) have proposed several quantitative and qualitative value categories it intends to examine in its study of the value of DERs. We submitted comments supporting their inclusion of avoided emissions costs, which covers both greenhouse gas emissions and ambient air pollutants, as a value category. We also encourage DEEP and PURA to include electricity system resilience among the quantifiable benefits of DER deployment.

The Department of Energy (DOE) recently asked for input on energy conservation standards for metal halide lamp fixtures. We submitted comments encourage DOE to continue monetizing the full climate benefits of greenhouse gas emissions reductions.

Following a ruling by the District of Montana, the Bureau of Land Management continued to decline to use the social cost of greenhouse gases in its anlysis of Buffalo and Miles City resource management plants. We submitted joint comments arguing that the agency should monetize the social cost of greenhouse gases on remand.

The Bureau of Land Management's assessment of the Vernon Well Pad project, which would establish 32 new oil wells in Utah, fails to estimate resulting greenhouse gas emissions or monetize climate impacts. We submitted joint comments arguing that BLM to monetize the project's climate impacts using the social cost of greenhouse gases.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently proposed a rule that would narrow the scope of civil rights protections for patients under the Affordable Care Act. We submitted comments that focus on serious flaws in HHS’s regulatory impact analysis for the proposal, which ignores potentially substantial costs to patients and makes unsupported claims regarding the proposal’s benefits.

The Department of Energy (DOE) recently proposed changes to its process for prescribing energy conservation standards for consumer products and commercial/industrial equipment. We submitted comments explaining how DOE’s proposed energy savings thresholds and consumer test are unjustified and will reduce important consumer and environmental benefits.

The Department of Energy (DOE) proposed changes to the Process Rule for prescribing energy conservation standards. We submitted comments and additional comments explaining how certain proposed changes violate both DOE's statutory mandate and the principles of rational rulemaking. We emphasize that the significance of energy savings must be weighed by considering all important costs and benefits.